Key result
The electrocardiogram demonstrated a low sensitivity of 38.0% and a specificity of 86.9% for detecting prior myocardial infarction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement.
Why the study?
Although the ECG still plays a major role in the diagnosis of prior MI, its diagnostic value remains uncertain compared to CMR with LGE.
Does the 12-lead ECG accurately detect prior myocardial infarction compared to CMR with LGE in patients undergoing CMR?
Observational (n=974)
Single-blind
No
Does the 12-lead ECG accurately detect prior myocardial infarction compared to CMR with LGE in patients undergoing CMR?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 38.0% (95% CI 31.6-44.8)
The 12-lead ECG has low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting prior myocardial infarction, indicating that a history of MI should not be based solely on an ECG but confirmed with imaging.
ECG misses most prior MIs; leaves open whether CMR confirmation is warranted beyond selected cohorts.
BACKGROUND: The best available imaging technique for the detection of prior myocardial infarction (MI) is cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Although the electrocardiogram (ECG) still plays a major role in the diagnosis of prior MI, the diagnostic value of the ECG remains uncertain. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of the ECG in the assessment of prior MI. METHODS: In this retrospective study, data from electronic patient files were collected of 1033 patients who had undergone CMR with LGE between January 2014 and December 2017. After the exclusion of 59 patients, the data of 974 patients were analysed. Twelve-lead ECGs were blinded and evaluated for signs of prior MI by two cardiologists separately. Disagreement in interpretation was resolved by the judgement of a third cardiologist. Outcomes of CMR with LGE were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the ECG in the detection of MI was 38.0% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 31.6-44.8%. The specificity was 86.9% (95% CI 84.4-89.1%). The positive and negative predictive value were 43.6% (95% CI 36.4-50.9%) and 84.0% (95% CI 81.4-86.5%) respectively. In 170 ECGs (17.5%), the two cardiologists disagreed on the presence or absence of MI. Inter-rater variability was moderate (κ 0.51, 95% CI 0.45-0.58, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ECG has a low diagnostic value in the detection of prior MI. However, if the ECG shows no signs of prior MI, the absence of MI is likely. This study confirms that a history of MI should not be based solely on an ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lobeek et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Prior myocardial infarction (n=974). Electrocardiogram (ECG) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of prior myocardial infarction (Sensitivity 38.0%, 95% CI 31.6-44.8). The electrocardiogram demonstrated a low sensitivity of 38.0% and a specificity of 86.9% for detecting prior myocardial infarction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: