Key result
Wearable accelerometer contact microphones successfully detect S2 paradoxical splitting in valvular heart disease.
Why the study?
S2 paradoxical splitting is an indicator of aortic stenosis, prompting investigation into whether S2 acoustic signatures can be captured accurately from seismocardiogram signals using a wearable accelerometer contact microphone.
Does a wearable accelerometer contact microphone accurately identify S2 paradoxical splitting in subjects with aortic stenosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
Does a wearable accelerometer contact microphone accurately identify S2 paradoxical splitting in subjects with aortic stenosis?
A wearable accelerometer contact microphone can accurately detect paradoxical S2 splitting, offering a potential novel non-invasive diagnostic tool for aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports wearable S2 monitoring feasibility in valvular disease; leaves open diagnostic role in aortic stenosis pending validation.
Second heart sound (S2) splitting can be used as an indicator for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases; specifically, paradoxical S2 splitting is an indicator of aortic stenosis (AS). We present that S2 acoustic signatures can be captured accurately from the seismocardiogram (SCG) signals of a sensitive wearable accelerometer contact microphone (ACM) and validated by comparing with digital stethoscope phonocardiogram (PCG) signals. The ACM was placed on the pulmonic region of 18 subjects, ten with no known heart disease and eight with known heart disease, for 60 s of SCG data collection. Smoothed pseudo Wigner–Ville distribution is used to extract S2 time split and to identify S2 paradoxical splitting. Healthy subjects had SCG S2 time splits range agreeing with S2 time splits from the past literature from PCG signals. The ACM SCG signal was also used to identify and capture paradoxical splitting from subjects with known valvular heart diseases such as AS, from subjects with mild to severe diagnosis. In conclusion, a wearable ACM can be used to detect paradoxical splitting in subjects suspected with aortic valvular heart disease and shows high fidelity of capturing S2 time split through SCG signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sang et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic stenosis (n=18). Wearable accelerometer contact microphone (ACM) vs. Digital stethoscope phonocardiogram (PCG) was evaluated on Identification of S2 paradoxical splitting. A wearable accelerometer contact microphone successfully captured S2 time splits and identified paradoxical splitting in 8 subjects with mild to severe valvular heart disease such as aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: