In this article, I have presented an overview of the conceptual and methodological issues that need to be taken into account when selecting an instrument to measure symptom occurrence and distress. In addition, I have listed available tools in the literature. Below is a list of critical questions that need to be considered when selecting an instrument to measure symptom distress.o1.What is my purpose for using the tool?—clinical assessment v research study; measurement of symptom occurrence or symptom distress.2.Are the individual items on the instrument useful for my needs?—what symptoms or symptom complexes are included?3.What population do I want to study?—age, type of illness, setting; has the tool been used previously with this population?4.Who will administer the instrument?—patient v observer.5.How long does it take to complete the instrument?6.What standardization procedures are necessary for administering and scoring the instrument?—clear and concise instructions; training sessions for recorders and scorers.7.Is the instrument reliable and valid?8.Do I need more than one instrument? If so, how do I combine results?9.Does the discussion of the instrument in the literature correspond to my desired study outcome? What is my purpose for using the tool?—clinical assessment v research study; measurement of symptom occurrence or symptom distress. Are the individual items on the instrument useful for my needs?—what symptoms or symptom complexes are included? What population do I want to study?—age, type of illness, setting; has the tool been used previously with this population? Who will administer the instrument?—patient v observer. How long does it take to complete the instrument? What standardization procedures are necessary for administering and scoring the instrument?—clear and concise instructions; training sessions for recorders and scorers. Is the instrument reliable and valid? Do I need more than one instrument? If so, how do I combine results? Does the discussion of the instrument in the literature correspond to my desired study outcome?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruth McCorkle (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: