Key result
Left atrial voltage mapping using the Tissue Proximity Indicator identified significantly smaller scarred areas compared to mapping without TPI (3.02 vs 9.15 cm2).
Why the study?
Does high-density bipolar voltage mapping using Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI) reduce false-positive scarred areas compared to mapping without TPI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=73)
Does high-density bipolar voltage mapping using Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI) reduce false-positive scarred areas compared to mapping without TPI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.02% vs 9.15%
The use of the Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI) during left atrial voltage mapping provides a more specific delineation of fibrosis by eliminating false-positive low-voltage points due to poor tissue contact.
TPI mapping was associated with smaller LA scar areas; hypothesis-generating for refined fibrosis assessment before changing ablation practice.
Aims Atrial fibrosis is associated with the pathogenesis and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate the extent of left atrial (LA) scarring in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) undergoing catheter ablation using a new impedance‐based algorithm. Methods We prospectively enrolled 73 consecutive patients (43 males, 58 years) with PAF who underwent pulmonary vein antral isolation. We first performed high‐density bipolar voltage mapping during sinus rhythm using Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI), one of the features of the ConfiDense mapping module integrated in the electroanatomic mapping system. A dense LA shell was created initially without TPI (mean points 2,411) and subsequently activating TPI (mean points 1,167). Each point was classified according to the peak‐to‐peak bipolar voltage electrogram based on two criteria (criterion A: healthy >0.8 mV, border zone: 0.4–0.8 mV, scarred: <0.4 mV; criterion B: healthy: >0.5 mV, border zone: 0.25–0.5 mV, scarred: <0.25 mV). Results LA voltage analysis represented significantly smaller scarred areas when mapping was performed with TPI‐ON compared with TPI‐OFF in both voltage criteria (average LA voltage area: 3.02 ± 5.28 cm 2 vs 9.15 ± 13.11 cm 2 vs in criterion A and 1.19 ± 2.54 cm 2 vs 5.61 ± 9.56 cm 2 in criterion B). A statistically significant voltage difference was observed in all segments of the left atrium between the two mapping protocols, particularly on the inferior wall. Conclusion A more specific delineation of LA fibrosis may be produced using the TPI feature of the ConfiDense mapping module, through elimination of false‐positive annotated mapping points due to low contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asvestas et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=73). Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI) mapping vs. Mapping without TPI was evaluated on Left atrial scarred area. Left atrial voltage mapping using the Tissue Proximity Indicator identified significantly smaller scarred areas compared to mapping without TPI (3.02 vs 9.15 cm2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: