Why the study?
Does NT-proBNP-guided therapy reduce cardiovascular death or cardiovascular rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
RCT (n=271)
Randomized
Does NT-proBNP-guided therapy reduce cardiovascular death or cardiovascular rehospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.22 (95% CI 0.84–1.76)
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 39%
p-value: p=0.305
NT-proBNP-guided therapy to intensify diuretic treatment prior to discharge in acute heart failure did not improve clinical outcomes at 182 days compared to standard clinical evaluation.
NT-proBNP guidance adds no benefit over clinical evaluation for acute HF discharge; confirms weak prior evidence against routine biomarker-directed diuretic intensification.
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute heart failure, high levels of N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at discharge are associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesized that NT-proBNP-guided therapy may improve prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients, admitted for acute heart failure, were prospectively randomized to NT-proBNP-guided therapy or control group. The NT-proBNP-guided therapy group underwent medical treatment intensification when predischarge NT-proBNP was at least 3000 pg/ml. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death or cardiovascular rehospitalization at day 182. The secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiovascular rehospitalization, heart failure rehospitalization, and cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization at day 182. Treatment intensification in the NT-proBNP-guided therapy group regarded mainly diuretics. The NT-proBNP strategy was not associated with a significant reduction of the primary endpoint [43% intervention vs. 39% controls, hazard ratio 1.22 (0.84, 1.76), P = 0.305] and of any secondary endpoint. The change of NT-proBNP from predischarge to discharge was associated with the risk of cardiovascular death or cardiovascular rehospitalization through day 182, even after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP-guided therapy resulted mainly in an increase of diuretics in acute setting and compared with clinical evaluation alone did not improve prognosis. However, the reduction of NT-proBNP at discharge was an independent predictor of outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carubelli et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure (n=271). NT-proBNP-guided therapy vs. Control group (clinical evaluation alone) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or cardiovascular rehospitalization at day 182 (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84-1.76, p=0.305).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: