Key result
Smoking was associated with significant differences in cognitive and affective functioning compared to non-smokers among college students.
Why the study?
Societal perceptions of smoking are often viewed in extremes, but its comparative perceived effects on psychological functioning among smokers and non-smokers warranted investigation.
Does smoking affect motor dexterity, cognitive, and affective functioning in college students?
Observational
Does smoking affect motor dexterity, cognitive, and affective functioning in college students?
Smoking is associated with significant differences in cognitive and affective functioning among college students.
Association in students should not change practice; leaves open causal effects on cognition and affect.
Background/Aim: Smoking addiction is a pervasive and high risk behavior linked with complex and damaging effects to a person’s biology, behaviors, psychological well-being and cultural influence. Chronic smoking is also associated with increased risk of exposure to neurodegenerative diseases and cigarette smoking poorly affects both cognitive and affective functioning of the smokers. The perceived effects of smoking are often generalized by society such that it is viewed in extremes. This means that the societal perceptions are either smoking serves as a “relaxing mechanism”, hence, making it as acceptable as any normal habit or that, conversely, smoking is gravely dangerous to one’s health when considered as a vice. This research focused on the causal comparative ex post facto of smoking and its perceived effects to the psychological functioning among smokers and non-smokers. Methods: O’ Connor Finger Dexterity Test, Abstract Reasoning Test and Affective Functioning Assessment Test were used as bases of data comparison between the two groups. Result/Conclusion: The test results indicate that there is a significant difference between the cognitive functioning and affective functioning among the smokers in comparison with non-smokers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgekutty Kochuchakkalackal Kuriala (2020) conducted an observational in Smoking. Smoking vs. Non-smokers was evaluated on Cognitive and affective functioning. Smoking was associated with significant differences in cognitive and affective functioning compared to non-smokers among college students.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: