Key result
The modified CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.408 per point increase) and showed better predictive value than the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUC 0.757 vs 0.676).
Why the study?
Few studies have assessed whether the CHA2DS2-VASc score has predictive value for recurrence after myocardial infarction.
Does the modified CHA2DS2-VASc score improve prediction of in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction compared to the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score in adult inpatients with myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=6,700)
Yes
Does the modified CHA2DS2-VASc score improve prediction of in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction compared to the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score in adult inpatients with myocardial infarction?
The modified CHA2DS2-VASc score provides better discrimination than the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction, particularly in men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change clinical risk assessment in MI inpatients; leaves open whether modified score enhances stratification pending validation.
Background Using the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to recognize the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation has been well-established. However, few studies have assessed whether the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score has a similar predictive value in recurrence after myocardial infarction (MI). Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of adult inpatients with MI. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and modified CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) scores of all patients were calculated. The associations of both scores with recurrent MI were analyzed. Results A total of 6,700 patients with MI (60.0 ± 11.1 years, 77.2% men) were enrolled, and 759 (11.3%) presented a definite recurrence during hospitalization. After multivariable adjustment by logistic regression in patients with MI, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores were independently associated with recurrence. The MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score showed a better predictive value for risk of recurrence than that of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc in overall [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.757 vs. 0.676] or male patients (AUC 0.759 vs. 0.708). MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was superior to CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc for identifying “truly high-risk” patients with MI, regardless of overall patients or sex-specific subgroups. The two scores had a similar focus on the identification of “low-risk” patients in overall or women, but not in men. Conclusion The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores for predicting recurrence are validated in patients with MI. However, MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc could be more helpful to secondary prevention than CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc after MI, especially in men. The superiority of MCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc compared with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc in women is just more discriminatory for “truly high-risk” patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=6,700). Modified CHA2DS2-VASc (MCHA2DS2-VASc) score vs. Lower score / Standard CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on In-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.408, 95% CI 1.365-1.452, p=<0.001). The modified CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.408 per point increase) and showed better predictive value than the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUC 0.757 vs 0.676).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: