Key result
Antero-apical pattern of LV-only paced QRS and apical/paraseptal LV lead position were associated with increased risk of death or hospitalization (multivariate HR 1.7, P=0.006 and HR 1.9, P=0.018).
Why the study?
Does LV lead position and paced QRS morphology impact long-term mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing CRT implantation?
Cohort (n=362)
Does LV lead position and paced QRS morphology impact long-term mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing CRT implantation?
Antero-apical LV paced QRS patterns and apical/paraseptal LV lead positions are associated with worse long-term mortality and morbidity in CRT patients and should be avoided.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Apical LV lead positions were associated with worse CRT outcomes; leaves open optimal positioning strategies pending randomized trials.
AIMS: To investigate the effect of implantation-related characteristics, especially lead position and left ventricular (LV)-paced QRS morphology, on long-term mortality and morbidity in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study retrospectively analysed 362 consecutive patients who underwent CRT device implantation over a 6 year period. Pre-implantation, LV-only paced, and biventricularly paced 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained. Left ventricular and right ventricular (RV) lead positions were determined using biplane fluoroscopy and roentgenograms. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival function for all-cause death/hospitalization and cardiovascular death/hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were also applied. The mean follow-up time was 24.7 ± 16.9 months. There were 79 deaths (62 cardiovascular) and 99 unplanned hospitalizations (72 cardiovascular). One year and 2 year all-cause mortality rates were 8.5 and 18.0%, respectively. Electrocardiographic and fluoroscopic descriptors of the LV lead position were found to be predictors of mortality/morbidity (as were functional class, heart failure aetiology, hyponatremia, and chronic atrial fibrillation). In particular, the antero-apical pattern of LV-only paced QRS showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.8 in univariate and 1.7 in multivariate analysis for predicting all-cause death/hospitalization (P = 0.006). The apical/paraseptal LV lead position showed an HR of 2.1 in univariate and 1.9 in multivariate analysis for predicting cardiovascular death/hospitalization (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: To achieve better long-term outcomes in CRT patients the antero-apical pattern of LV QRS complexes and apical or paraseptal LV lead position should be avoided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jastrzębski et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=362). Antero-apical pattern of LV-only paced QRS and apical/paraseptal LV lead position vs. Other lead positions and QRS patterns was evaluated on All-cause death/hospitalization (HR 1.7, p=0.006). Antero-apical pattern of LV-only paced QRS and apical/paraseptal LV lead position were associated with increased risk of death or hospitalization (multivariate HR 1.7, P=0.006 and HR 1.9, P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: