Key result
Lean body mass correlated significantly with systolic blood pressure in adolescents (r=0.52, P<0.001) and adults (r=0.19, P<0.001), erasing categorical blood pressure differences between genders.
Why the study?
Is lean body mass associated with blood pressure differences between genders in adolescents and adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,175)
Is lean body mass associated with blood pressure differences between genders in adolescents and adults?
Effect estimate: r = 0.52
p-value: p=<.001
Gender-related differences in blood pressure appear to be driven by inherent differences in muscle bulk (lean body mass) rather than gender itself.
Lean body mass may explain apparent gender BP differences; cross-sectional data leaves open causality and clinical application.
BACKGROUND: Body size correlates positively with blood pressure (BP) but there is controversy about the roles of obesity versus muscularity in this relationship. METHODS: We examined the BP relationship with overweight, lean body mass (LBM), and muscle performance in 231 adolescents (17.25 +/- 3.07 years, 123 males). The skinfold thickness (SKINT) was used to measure overweight, as this was a growing population. RESULTS: Maximal foot torque, a measure of muscle strength, correlated strongly (r = 0.51, P < .001) to LBM attesting to the validity of the calculated LBM. Anthropometric measurements were available also in 944 adults (29.9 +/- 5.5 years, 461 men). Correlations of LBM to systolic (adolescents r = 0.52, adults r = 0.19, both P < .001) and diastolic (adolescents r = 0.47, adults r = 0.20, both P < .001) BP were highly significant. SKINT also correlated significantly to systolic and diastolic BP in adolescents and in adults, respectively. In both genders and populations an increasing SKINT was associated with a similar increase in BP, but this effect was superimposed on an average 10 mm Hg between-gender BP difference. The LBM in both groups and genders related to the BP in an identical fashion; the men were on the high and the women on the low end of the same BP/LBM correlation line. Thus, the amount of LBM erased categoric BP differences between the genders. CONCLUSIONS: The gender-related BP differences appear to reflect the inherent gender differences in muscle bulk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S Julius (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure (n=1,175). Lean body mass was evaluated on Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.52, p=<.001). Lean body mass correlated significantly with systolic blood pressure in adolescents (r=0.52, P<0.001) and adults (r=0.19, P<0.001), erasing categorical blood pressure differences between genders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: