Key result
Women with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation were more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets, such as roof lines (53.9% vs 45.3%, P=0.0002), compared with men.
Why the study?
Women presenting for AF ablation tend to have more nonpulmonary vein triggers and advanced atrial disease compared with men, but whether this informs differences in AF ablation strategy is not well described.
Are there sex differences in ablation strategy and complications among patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=5,356)
Yes
Are there sex differences in ablation strategy and complications among patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Women with nonparoxysmal AF are more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets during catheter ablation compared with men, highlighting sex-based differences in ablation strategies that warrant further investigation.
Sex differences in adjunctive lesion sets for nonparoxysmal AF ablation warrant caution; leaves open whether strategies should be sex-tailored.
Background: When presenting for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, women, compared with men, tend to have more nonpulmonary vein triggers and advanced atrial disease. Whether this informs differences in AF ablation strategy is not well described. We aimed to characterize ablation strategy and complications by sex, using the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry. Methods: From the Get With The Guidelines-AF registry ablation feature, we included patients who underwent initial AF ablation procedure between January 7, 2016, and December 27, 2019. Patients were stratified based on AF type (paroxysmal versus nonparoxysmal) and sex. We compared patient demographics, ablation strategy, and complications by sex. Results: Among 5356 patients from 31 sites who underwent AF ablation, 1969 were women (36.8%). Women, compared with men, were older (66.8±9.6 versus 63.4±10.6, P <0.0001) and were more likely to have paroxysmal AF (59.4% versus 49.5%, P <0.0001). In women with nonparoxysmal AF, left atrial linear ablation was more frequent (roof line: 53.9% versus 45.3%, P =0.0002; inferior mitral isthmus line: 10.2% versus 7.0%, P =0.01; floor line: 46.1% versus 40.6%, P =0.02) than in men. In multivariable analysis, the association between patient sex and complications from ablation was not statistically significant. Conclusions: In this US wide AF ablation quality improvement registry, women with nonparoxysmal AF were more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets compared with men. These findings suggest that patient sex may inform ablation strategy in ways that may not be strongly supported by evidence and emphasize the need to clarify optimal ablation strategies by sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yunus et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=5,356). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Roof line ablation in nonparoxysmal AF (p=0.0002). Women with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation were more likely to receive adjunctive lesion sets, such as roof lines (53.9% vs 45.3%, P=0.0002), compared with men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: