Key result
A machine learning diagnostic signature using multi-modality electronic health record data detected HFpEF with an AUROC of 90% (P<0.001) and average precision of 74% in a validation cohort.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is thought to be highly prevalent yet remains underdiagnosed.
Does a machine learning-based diagnostic signature using multi-modality EHR data accurately predict the likelihood of HFpEF in patients with unexplained dyspnea compared to existing clinical scores?
Observational (n=1,854)
No
Does a machine learning-based diagnostic signature using multi-modality EHR data accurately predict the likelihood of HFpEF in patients with unexplained dyspnea compared to existing clinical scores?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.90 (95% CI 0.898-0.902)
p-value: p=<0.001
An automated machine learning pipeline using structured and unstructured EHR data can accurately identify patients with HFpEF among those presenting with unexplained dyspnea, outperforming the existing H2FPEF score.
Supports ML-based HFpEF detection in unexplained dyspnea; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is thought to be highly prevalent yet remains underdiagnosed. We sought to develop a data-driven diagnostic model to predict from electronic health records (EHR) the likelihood of HFpEF among patients with unexplained dyspnea and preserved left ventricular EF. Methods & Results The derivation cohort comprised patients with dyspnea and echocardiography results. Structured and unstructured data were extracted using an automated informatics pipeline. Patients were retrospectively diagnosed as HFpEF (cases), non-HF (control cohort I), or HF with reduced EF (HFrEF; control cohort II). The ability of clinical parameters and investigations to discriminate cases from controls was evaluated by extreme gradient boosting. A likelihood scoring system was developed and validated in a separate test cohort. The derivation cohort included 1585 consecutive patients: 133 cases of HFpEF (9%), 194 non-HF cases (Control cohort I) and 1258 HFrEF cases (Control cohort II). Two HFpEF diagnostic signatures were derived, comprising symptoms, diagnoses and investigation results. A final prediction model was generated based on the averaged likelihood scores from these two models. In a validation cohort consisting of 269 consecutive patients (with 66 HFpEF cases (24.5%)), the diagnostic power of detecting HFpEF had an AUROC of 90% (P<0.001) and average precision (AP) of 74%. Conclusion This diagnostic signature enables discrimination of HFpEF from non-cardiac dyspnea or HFrEF from EHR and can assist in the diagnostic evaluation in patients with unexplained dyspnea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farajidavar et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) (n=1,854). Machine learning diagnostic signature vs. Expert clinical consensus and H2FPEF score was evaluated on Diagnostic power of detecting HFpEF (AUROC) (AUROC 0.90, 95% CI 0.898-0.902, p=<0.001). A machine learning diagnostic signature using multi-modality electronic health record data detected HFpEF with an AUROC of 90% (P<0.001) and average precision of 74% in a validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: