Why the study?
Does a one-month intensive residential rehabilitation programme improve long-term exercise capacity, physical activity patterns, and mortality at six years in patients with chronic heart failure?
Population
50 patients with chronic heart failure at a residential rehabilitation centre in Switzerland.
Comparison
Intensive rehabilitation programme lasting one… vs Control group.
Design
RCT, Randomized to exercise or control groups
Follow-up
6 years
Key result
A one-month intensive rehabilitation program increased peak Vo2 by 21.4% (P<0.05) in patients with chronic heart failure, though the increase was only 7% (NS) at six years.
Authors
Loading...
One-month intensive rehab yields only transient VO2 gains in chronic HF without mortality benefit; challenges durability assumptions and supports maintenance strategies.
RCT (n=50)
randomized
No
Does a one-month intensive residential rehabilitation programme improve long-term exercise capacity, physical activity patterns, and mortality at six years in patients with chronic heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.05
A one-month intensive cardiac rehabilitation program in heart failure patients significantly improves short-term exercise capacity, but these physiological benefits largely attenuate over six years without a significant reduction in mortality.
Mueller et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=50). Intensive rehabilitation programme vs. Control was evaluated on Change in peak Vo(2) during the rehabilitation programme (p=<0.05). A one-month intensive rehabilitation program increased peak Vo2 by 21.4% (P<0.05) in patients with chronic heart failure, though the increase was only 7% (NS) at six years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: