Key result
A one-month intensive rehabilitation program increased peak Vo2 by 21.4% (P<0.05) in patients with chronic heart failure, though the increase was only 7% (NS) at six years.
Why the study?
Does a one-month intensive residential rehabilitation programme improve long-term exercise capacity, physical activity patterns, and mortality at six years in patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=50)
randomized
No
Does a one-month intensive residential rehabilitation programme improve long-term exercise capacity, physical activity patterns, and mortality at six years in patients with chronic heart failure?
A one-month intensive cardiac rehabilitation program in heart failure patients significantly improves short-term exercise capacity, but these physiological benefits largely attenuate over six years without a significant reduction in mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the short- and long-term effects of an intensive, concentrated rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic heart failure. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial, with one-month and six-year evaluations. SETTING: Residential rehabilitation centre in Switzerland. SUBJECTS: Fifty patients with chronic heart failure, randomized to exercise or control groups. INTERVENTIONS: A rehabilitation programme lasting one month, including educational sessions, a low-fat diet, and 2 hours of individually prescribed exercise daily. MAIN MEASURES: Exercise test responses, health outcomes and physical activity patterns. RESULTS: Peak Vo(2) increased 21.4% in the exercise group during the rehabilitation programme (P<0.05), whereas peak Vo(2) did not change among controls. After the six-year follow-up period, peak Vo(2) was only slightly higher than that at baseline in the trained group (7%, NS), while peak Vo(2) among controls was unchanged. During long-term follow-up, 9 and 12 patients died in the exercise and control groups, respectively (P = 0.63). At six years, physical activity patterns tended to be higher in the exercise group; the mean energy expenditure values over the last year were 2,704 +/- 1,970 and 2,085 +/- 1,522 kcal/week during recreational activities for the exercise and control groups, respectively. However, both groups were more active compared to energy expenditure prior to their cardiac event (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Six years after participation in a residential rehabilitation programme, patients with chronic heart failure had slightly better outcomes than control subjects, maintained exercise capacity and engaged in activities that exceed the minimal amount recommended by guidelines for cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mueller et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=50). Intensive rehabilitation programme vs. Control was evaluated on Change in peak Vo(2) during the rehabilitation programme (p=<0.05). A one-month intensive rehabilitation program increased peak Vo2 by 21.4% (P<0.05) in patients with chronic heart failure, though the increase was only 7% (NS) at six years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: