Key result
In a canine model of coronary stenosis, the extent of the functional defect was smaller than the perfusion defect during vasodilation (25.3% vs 35.3% of LV circumference; P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does fast MR imaging reveal differences in the extent of functional versus perfusion defects during vasodilation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis?
Does fast MR imaging reveal differences in the extent of functional versus perfusion defects during vasodilation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis?
In a canine model of coronary stenosis, fast MR imaging demonstrates that the sizes of ischemic regions defined by perfusion defects and functional defects differ significantly during vasodilation.
Perfusion may overestimate ischemic extent versus function in stenosis; leaves open translation to clinical CMR protocols.
Magnetic resonance (MR) functional and perfusion imaging were employed in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis (n = 6) for the quantification of functional and perfusion deficits before and after dipyridamole administration. Left anterior descending and circumflex (LCX) coronary blood flow were measured continuously after placing Doppler flowmeters. Inversion recovery gradient echo images during the transit of MR contrast medium gadolinium-benzyloxypropionictetraacetate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA/Dimeg) and fast breath-hold cine MR images were acquired at baseline, during LCX stenosis in basal state, and during LCX stenosis with vasodilation (dipyridamole 0.5 mg/kg). The extent of the functional defect and perfusion defect was expressed as percent of left ventricle (LV) circumference. During stenosis (LCX flow: 62.6 +/- 5.6% of baseline) the extent of the functional defect was slightly larger than the perfusion defect (11.0 +/- 1.8% versus 6.3 +/- 1.70% of LV circumference, respectively; P < 0.01). During vasodilation the extent of the functional defect was considerably smaller than the perfusion defect (25.3 +/- 2.5% versus 35.3 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.01). Thus, the sizes of ischemic regions displayed by MR perfusion defect and functional defect differ from each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwitter et al. (1999) studied non-occlusive coronary artery stenosis (n=6). Dipyridamole vs. Basal state (no dipyridamole) was evaluated on Extent of functional defect versus perfusion defect (percent of LV circumference) during vasodilation (p=<0.01). In a canine model of coronary stenosis, the extent of the functional defect was smaller than the perfusion defect during vasodilation (25.3% vs 35.3% of LV circumference; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: