Older age at bioprosthetic valve implantation was associated with a decreased risk of reoperation for both aortic (HR 0.94 per year; P<0.001) and mitral (HR 0.96 per year; P<0.001) replacements.
Cohort (n=3,975)
What is the median interval to reoperation for patients undergoing first-time bioprosthetic left heart valve replacement according to age at implantation?
The median interval to reoperation for bioprosthetic valves is significantly shorter in younger patients, providing important prognostic information for shared decision-making regarding valve selection.
Hazard Ratio: 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96)
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting the use of bioprostheses for heart valve replacement in young adults is accumulating. However, reoperation data, which may help guide clinical decision making in young patients, remains poorly defined in the literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the need for reoperation in 3975 patients who underwent first-time bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n=3152) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n=823). There were 895 patients below the age of 60 years at bioprosthesis implant (AVR, n=636; MVR, n=259). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary, stented aortic bioprostheses was 7.74 years (95% CI 7.28 to 9.97 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 12.93 years (95% CI 11.10 to 15.76 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. Multivariable risk factors associated with reoperation following bioprosthetic AVR include age (hazard ratio HR 0.94 per year, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96, P<0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99, P=0.04). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary mitral bioprostheses was 8.11 years (95% CI 5.79 to 16.50 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 10.14 years (95% CI 8.64 to 11.14 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. As for AVR, age (HR 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98, P<0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.93, P=0.03) were associated with decreased reoperation risk following bioprosthetic MVR. CONCLUSIONS: These data constitute clinically relevant age-specific prognostic information regarding reoperation in young patients, who may wish to select a bioprosthesis at initial left heart valve replacement.
Chan et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in First-time bioprosthetic aortic or mitral valve replacement (n=3,975). Age at implantation was evaluated on Reoperation following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96, p=<0.001). Older age at bioprosthetic valve implantation was associated with a decreased risk of reoperation for both aortic (HR 0.94 per year; P<0.001) and mitral (HR 0.96 per year; P<0.001) replacements.