Key result
Cardiac CT shows ~41-point lower sensitivity for LAA-ostium thrombi compared to intra-appendage thrombi.
Why the study?
Cardiac CT is an emerging non-invasive modality for assessing left atrial appendage thrombus, but existing results were conflicting.
Does cardiac CT accurately detect left atrial appendage thrombus compared to trans-oesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Case-Control (n=726)
Blinded assessors
No
Does cardiac CT accurately detect left atrial appendage thrombus compared to trans-oesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 48.3% vs 89.3%
p-value: p=0.001
Cardiac CT with a 30-second delay has significantly lower sensitivity than TEE for detecting highly mobile thrombi located at the LAA ostium, highlighting its limitations as a standalone tool to rule out LAA thrombus before AF ablation.
Cardiac CT risks missing LAA-ostium thrombi; leaves open its reliability versus TEE before AF ablation.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac CT (CCT) is an emerging non-invasive modality for assessing left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus, but the results were conflicting. Our study aims to evaluate the accuracy of CCT for detecting LAA thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, using trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Patient data were collected from a tertiary hospital in China between 2017 and 2022. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 726 patients (male: 60.2%, age: 61±11 years) who had both TEE and CCT before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. MEASURES: The CCT protocol consisted of one angiographic phase and one delayed scan 30 s later. LAA thrombi were defined as solid masses on TEE or persistent defects on CCT. The thrombus dimension and location, the LAA filling and emptying flow velocity were assessed by TEE. RESULTS: Of the 57 (7.9%) patients with LAA thrombi identified by TEE, 29 (50.9%) were located at the LAA ostium, and 28 (49.1%) were in the LAA. The former showed higher motility following blood flow and heartbeats than the latter. The CCT detected 14 (48.3%) of the LAA-ostium thrombi but 25 (89.3%) of those in the LAA (p=0.001). The LAA-ostium thrombi with the LAA mean flow velocity >0.35 m/s and maximum diameters <10 mm were more prone to have CCT false-negative results. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, CCT with a 30 s delay scan is less sensitive to LAA thrombi than TEE, especially for LAA-ostium thrombi with smaller sizes and higher LAA flow velocity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Atrial Fibrillation (n=726). Cardiac CT with a 30 s delayed scan vs. Trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Sensitivity of CCT for detecting LAA thrombi based on location (LAA-ostium vs. in LAA) (p=0.001). Cardiac CT with a 30 s delayed scan was significantly less sensitive in detecting LAA-ostium thrombi compared to thrombi within the LAA (48.3% vs 89.3%, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: