Key result
REACH-HFpEF protocol evaluates whether 12-week home-based rehab improves quality of life in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Does a 12-week health professional-facilitated, home-based rehabilitation intervention (REACH-HF) improve disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
RCT (n=372)
Open-label with blinded outcome assessment
1:1
Yes
Does a 12-week health professional-facilitated, home-based rehabilitation intervention (REACH-HF) improve disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
This protocol outlines a multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based rehabilitation intervention for patients with HFpEF and their caregivers.
Protocol for multicenter RCT of home-based rehab in HFpEF; leaves open clinical and cost-effectiveness until results reported.
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and causes functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and impairs prognosis. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a promising intervention for HFpEF, but there is currently insufficient evidence to support its routine use. This trial will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 12-week health professional-facilitated, home-based rehabilitation intervention (REACH-HF), in people with HFpEF, for participants and their caregivers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: REACH-HFpEF is a parallel two group multicentre randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care (intervention group) or usual care alone (control group) with a target sample size of 372 participants with HFpEF and their caregivers recruited from secondary care centres in United Kingdom. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blinded; outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-month and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be patients' disease-specific HRQoL, measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include patient's exercise capacity, psychological well-being, level of physical activity, generic HRQoL, self-management, frailty, blood biomarkers, mortality, hospitalisations, and serious adverse events, and caregiver's HRQoL and burden. A process evaluation and substudy will assess the fidelity of intervention delivery and adherence to the home-based exercise regime and explore potential mediators and moderators of changes in HRQoL with the intervention. Qualitative studies will describe facilitators' experiences of delivery of the intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the REACH-HF intervention in participants with HFpEF will estimate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year at 12 months. The CEA will be conducted from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and a wider societal perspective. The adequacy of trial recruitment in an initial 6-month internal pilot period will also be checked. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (ref 21/WS/0085). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations to researchers, service users and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN47894539.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=372). REACH-HF intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Disease-specific health-related quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire total score) at 12 months. The REACH-HFpEF trial is a protocol designed to evaluate whether a 12-week home-based rehabilitation intervention improves disease-specific quality of life at 12 months in patients with HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: