Key result
Intravenous enoxaparin without monitoring during percutaneous left atrial interventions resulted in a 3% rate of in-hospital death, embolic complications, and BARC type ≥3a bleeding.
Why the study?
Does intravenous enoxaparin prevent in-hospital death, embolic complications, and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial cardiac procedures?
Observational (n=198)
No
Does intravenous enoxaparin prevent in-hospital death, embolic complications, and bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial cardiac procedures?
Intravenous enoxaparin without monitoring appears to be a feasible and potentially safe anticoagulation strategy during percutaneous left atrial structural interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unmonitored IV enoxaparin may be feasible for left atrial interventions; leaves open randomized comparison versus heparin before practice change.
AIMS: Percutaneous transcatheter device closure of left atrial appendage (LAA), patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial septal defect (ASD) are usually performed with unfractionated heparin anticoagulation. We report a first experience using intravenous (IV) enoxaparin without anticoagulation monitoring in transcatheter structural heart interventions performed in the left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective, non-controlled study included all consecutive and unselected patients who underwent percutaneous LAA, PFO or ASD closure at a tertiary care centre using IV enoxaparin anticoagulation. The primary composite endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital death, embolic complications (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and peripheral arterial embolism) and bleedings defined as type 3a or more according to the BARC definitions. We enrolled 198 patients (mean age 60±18 years, 55% male) with an indication for LAA (40.4%), PFO (34.3%) or ASD closure (25.3%). The majority of patients (n=163, 82%) received a single IV enoxaparin dose of 0.5 mg/kg. The composite endpoint occurred in six (3%) patients including four (2%) type 3a bleedings, one (0.5%) transient ischaemic attack and one (0.5%) death from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: IV enoxaparin without monitoring appears to be a potentially safe and easy-to-use anticoagulation regimen in percutaneous LA cardiac interventions. Further investigations with larger cohorts of patients are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guedeney et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Percutaneous LAA, PFO or ASD closure (n=198). Intravenous (IV) enoxaparin was evaluated on In-hospital death, embolic complications (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and peripheral arterial embolism) and bleedings defined as type 3a or more according to the BARC definitions. Intravenous enoxaparin without monitoring during percutaneous left atrial interventions resulted in a 3% rate of in-hospital death, embolic complications, and BARC type ≥3a bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: