Key result
Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay compared to standard therapy (10.0 vs 15.0 days; p=0.016) in patients with acute symptomatic PE and/or DVT.
Why the study?
Does rivaroxaban reduce the length of hospital stay in patients with acute symptomatic PE and/or DVT compared to UFH and warfarin?
RCT (n=97)
Open-label
randomized
Does rivaroxaban reduce the length of hospital stay in patients with acute symptomatic PE and/or DVT compared to UFH and warfarin?
Rivaroxaban significantly reduces the length of hospital stay compared to standard UFH/warfarin therapy in Japanese patients with acute symptomatic PE or DVT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports earlier discharge and resource efficiency with rivaroxaban in acute PE/DVT; confirms RCT advantages of NOAC regimens over UFH/warfarin.
BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard of care for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) consists of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin, which was recently compared with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, in randomized trials. AIM: To examine the length of hospital stay in patients with PE and/or DVT receiving rivaroxaban compared to Japanese standard therapy in the Japanese (J)-EINSTEIN PE and DVT program. METHODS: Open-label, randomized clinical trials that compared 3, 6, or 12 months of rivaroxaban with UFH and warfarin in patients with acute, confirmed symptomatic proximal PE and/or DVT. Decisions regarding hospital admission and/or discharge were left to the clinical judgment of attending physicians. Analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: In the ITT population (N = 97), overall patient characteristics were similar in both treatment arms. The median length of stay in rivaroxaban patients was 10.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0 to 15.0 days) while it was 15.0 days (IQR 9.0 to 22.0) for patients on standard therapy (p = 0.016). All of the four DVT patients who were not hospitalized for the index event were in the rivaroxaban arm. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that treatment with rivaroxaban may significantly reduce the length of hospital stay in patients hospitalized for PE and/or DVT compared with the current standard of care in Japan, thereby reducing the burden on patients and the healthcare system. The limitations of our study include small sample size and the generalizability of the findings to the real-world setting. Further research is warranted to identify PE and/or DVT patients in Japanese clinical practice who may potentially be managed as outpatients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01516814 and NCT01516840.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuo et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in acute, confirmed symptomatic proximal PE and/or DVT (n=97). Rivaroxaban vs. Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin was evaluated on length of hospital stay (p=0.016). Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the median length of hospital stay compared to standard therapy (10.0 vs 15.0 days; p=0.016) in patients with acute symptomatic PE and/or DVT.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: