Why the study?
Does omapatrilat improve functional recovery in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia and reperfusion compared to ramipril?
Does omapatrilat improve functional recovery in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia and reperfusion compared to ramipril?
Dual NEP-ACE inhibition with omapatrilat provides superior cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury compared to ACE inhibition alone in a rat model, mediated by bradykinin and BNP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating in rat ischemia-reperfusion; leaves open clinical translation of dual NEP-ACE inhibition.
The objective of the present study was to assess the cardioprotective effect of dual NEP-ACE inhibition in relation to endogenous cardiac bradykinin (BK), its active metabolite des-Arg9-BK, endogenous brain natriuretic peptides (BNP), and cGMP. Rats were treated with the dual metallopeptidase inhibitor, omapatrilat, or the ACE inhibitor, ramipril, for 7 d (1 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)). Hearts were then isolated and subjected to a zero-flow ischemia and reperfusion (except controls), in the absence or presence of either a B2-receptor antagonist (Hoe-140), a B1-receptor antagonist (Lys-Leu8-des-Arg9-BK), or the GC-A/GC-B-receptor antagonist (HS-142-1). Chronic omapatrilat and ramipril increased the amount of endogenous BK collected upon reperfusion, but only ramipril increased that of des-Arg9-BK. Only omapatrilat increased both peak BNP and peak cGMP upon reperfusion, those increases being blocked by Hoe-140. Chronic omapatrilat (but not ramipril) decreased the total noradrenaline and lactate dehydrogenase release during the reperfusion period. Importantly, only omapatrilat improved the functional recovery of the ischemic reperfused heart, with a reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and improved developed left ventricular pressure. All cardio protective effects of omapatrilat were blocked by Hoe-140 and by HS-142-1, but not by the B1-receptor antagonist. In conclusion, a chronic treatment with a dual metallopeptidase inhibitor demonstrated a cardioprotective action not observed with an ACE inhibitor in a context of severe ischemia in rat isolated hearts, which was mediated by both endogenous BK and BNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumoulin et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: