Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population study assesses how demographics and health factors affect urinary calcium isotopes, suggesting key influences.
Isotopes of calcium (Ca) in blood and urine have been introduced as a potential clinical tool for monitoring bone mineral balance (BMB). While several works support the ability of Ca isotope composition (δ44/42Ca) to capture a shift in BMB in response to external forcings (e.g. bed rest) or disease (e.g. osteoporosis), the influence of an individual’s demographic, health status, diet or lifestyle on δ44/42CaUrine/Blood remains largely unconstrained. To gauge the effects of several variables among these four broader categories, we present a population study of δ44/42CaUrine from 103 individuals (age 18-76). Age is negatively correlated with δ44/42CaUrine, and we identify three other attributes (active vitamin D deficiency, vegetarian diet, and being post-menopausal) that lead to systematic differences in an individual’s δ44/42CaUrine. Fluctuations in Ca reabsorption generate significant intra-individual δ44/42CaUrine variability. Within a typical range of reabsorption rates, however, the initial isotope composition (δ44/42CaSerum) exerts the strongest control on inter-individual δ44/42CaUrine variability. Using a simple Rayleigh model to express isotopic fractionation associated with Ca reabsorption in the kidneys, we find that a fractionation factor of 0.99972 reproduces the range of isotope ratios and excretion values for several, healthy individuals across three different studies and nearly a 30-year age span. Importantly, δ44/42CaUrine variations in three post-menopausal women from three separate studies cannot be explained by the same model, pointing to a different mechanistic control of δ44/42CaUrine in these subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razionale et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: