Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan maintains benefit over valsartan in HFpEF regardless of baseline medication count.
Why the study?
Patients with HFpEF have a high comorbidity burden requiring multiple medications, prompting this evaluation of the association between polypharmacy status and outcomes.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths compared to valsartan across different polypharmacy categories in patients with HFpEF?
RCT (n=4,793)
double-blind
randomly assigned
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths compared to valsartan across different polypharmacy categories in patients with HFpEF?
Polypharmacy is highly prevalent and associated with worse outcomes in HFpEF, but it does not attenuate the clinical benefits of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sacubitril/valsartan in HFpEF with polypharmacy; extends PARAGON-HF findings to high-medication-burden subgroups.
Aims Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a particularly high prevalence of comorbidities, often necessitating treatment with many medications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between polypharmacy status and outcomes in PARAGON-HF. Methods and results In this post hoc analysis, baseline medication status was available in 4793 of 4796 patients included in the primary analysis of PARAGON-HF. The effects of sacubitril/valsartan, compared with valsartan, were assessed according to the number of medications at baseline: 683 non-polypharmacy (<5 medications); 2750 polypharmacy (5–9 medications), and 1360 hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 medications). The primary outcome was total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths. Patients with hyper-polypharmacy were older, had more severe limitations due to HF (worse New York Heart Association class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores), and had greater comorbidity. The non-adjusted risk of the primary outcome was significantly higher in patients taking more medications, and similar trends were seen for HF hospitalization and cardiovascular and all-cause death. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan on the primary outcome from the lowest to highest polypharmacy category was (as a rate ratio): 1.19 (0.76–1.85), 0.94 (0.77–1.15), and 0.77 (0.61–0.96) (pinteraction = 0.16). Treatment-related adverse events were more common in patients in the higher polypharmacy categories but not more common with sacubitril/valsartan, versus valsartan, in any polypharmacy category. Conclusions Polypharmacy is very common in patients with HFpEF, and those with polypharmacy have worse clinical status and a higher rate of non-fatal and fatal outcomes. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was not diminished in patients taking a larger number of medications at baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=4,793). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily) was evaluated on Total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths (Rate ratios: 1.19 (<5 meds), 0.94 (5-9 meds), and 0.77 (≥10 meds), p=pinteraction = 0.16). In patients with HFpEF, the benefit of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan on total heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths was not diminished in those taking a larger number of baseline medications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: