Key result
Trimetazidine improved left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular remodeling parameters compared to control in patients with cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Does trimetazidine improve left ventricular function and cardiopulmonary exercise parameters in patients with cardiomyopathy?
Meta-Analysis (n=898)
Does trimetazidine improve left ventricular function and cardiopulmonary exercise parameters in patients with cardiomyopathy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trimetazidine effectively improves left ventricular systolic function and reverses adverse remodeling in patients with cardiomyopathy.
To explore the effect of trimetazidine (TMZ) in cardiomyopathy treatment. Literatures, related with TMZ treatment for cardiomyopathy, were retrieved between 1990 and February 2018 in the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library systems. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing [resting heart rate (RHR), peak heart rate (PHR), peak systolic blood pressure (PSBP), and resting systolic blood pressure (RSBP)] and echocardiographic results [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), systolic wall thickening score index (SWTSI), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)] were merged to detect the publication bias. Total 898 patients with cardiomyopathy were divided into two groups: TMZ-treated group (n=456) and control group (n=442). There was no difference in the improvement of cardiomyopathy between the TMZ and control group. No publication bias was shown for PHR (t= 0.9791, P=0.5067). There were significant differences in LVEF, LVESV, SWTSI, LVESD, and LVEDD between the TMZ group and the control group. TMZ-treatment significantly increased the level of LVEF (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.46–7.84, P<0.001), and reduced the level of LVESV (95% CI: −18.73 to −7.77, P<0.001), SWTSI (95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15, Z = −3.85, P=0.001), LVESD (95% CI: −1.09 to −0.08, P<0.001), and LVEDD (95% CI: −0.55 to −0.26, P=0.023). There was no publication bias except for LVEDV (t = 2.5456, P=0.0438). TMZ is effective for cardiomyopathy treatment and worth to popularize in clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiomyopathy (n=898). Trimetazidine vs. Control group was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 6.65, 95% CI 5.46-7.84, p=<0.001). Trimetazidine improved left ventricular ejection fraction and ventricular remodeling parameters compared to control in patients with cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: