Key result
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is linked to poorer physical function, walking performance, and lean mass.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular diastolic dysfunction reduce physical function and body composition in maintenance hemodialysis patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=82)
Yes
Does left ventricular diastolic dysfunction reduce physical function and body composition in maintenance hemodialysis patients?
p-value: p=<0.05
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent in maintenance hemodialysis patients and is independently associated with reduced physical capacity and muscle wasting.
May flag functional decline risk in hemodialysis; leaves open causality and intervention effects.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the main cause of death in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Muscle wasting and physical function decline are common in MHD patients, and significantly impair their quality of life. These can result from abnormalities in cardiac function, which can be further worsened by physical deconditioning. Left ventricular diastolic function parameters were recently shown to be a better predictor of exercise capacity than systolic measures in patients with CV complications. But little is known about the relationship between cardiac function and physical function in MHD patients. METHODS: In 82 MHD patients, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) was assessed by ejection fraction and fractional shortening with echocardiography, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) was assessed by pulse wave and tissue Doppler indices. Physical function was assessed by gait speed, performance on a shuttle walk test, and leg muscle strength. Dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to measure whole body lean mass (WBLM). RESULTS: The prevalence of LVDD and LVSD was 48.8 and 12.2%, respectively. Gait speed, shuttle walk time, leg strength, and WBLM% were significantly higher in the group without LVDD than with LVDD (p < 0.05 for all). However, there was no significant difference in any measure of physical function or body composition between patients with and without LVSD. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that LVDD is more closely related to physical function and body composition than LVSD in MHD patients, and hence that LVDD may be an important therapeutic target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Maintenance hemodialysis (n=82). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction vs. Absence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was evaluated on Physical function (gait speed, shuttle walk time, leg strength) and whole body lean mass percentage (p=<0.05). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was associated with significantly reduced physical function, walking performance, and whole body lean mass compared to patients without diastolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: