Key result
This review examines the safety and efficacy of implanting drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Do drug-eluting stents improve safety and efficacy compared to bare-metal stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction?
Do drug-eluting stents improve safety and efficacy compared to bare-metal stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction?
This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Stent selection in STEMI PCI remains unresolved; leaves open optimal DES versus BMS strategy pending higher-level evidence.
While the benefits of drug-eluting stents (DES) in low-risk populations are well established, there is ongoing debate about their role in the higher risk setting of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. This was in response to early studies, which investigated the first generation of DES, demonstrating increased occurrence of very late stent thrombosis. However, more potent antiplatelet agents, novel antithrombotic agents and evolution of DES design and polymers have reduced the occurrence of very late stent thrombosis. Studies evaluating shorter duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following the use of DES are currently underway. This review examines the relevant literature and analyzes the safety and efficacy of implanting DES in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunadian et al. (2012) conducted a review in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Drug-eluting stents vs. Bare-metal stents was evaluated. This review examines the safety and efficacy of implanting drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: