Key result
Patients with documented complete A-V block had a significantly longer mean H-Q interval (89 msec) compared to those without A-V block (56 msec) or uncertain cause (64 msec) (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the H-Q interval on His bundle electrogram predict the presence of high-grade A-V block in patients with bundle branch block and transient neurologic symptoms?
Observational (n=19)
Does the H-Q interval on His bundle electrogram predict the presence of high-grade A-V block in patients with bundle branch block and transient neurologic symptoms?
Absolute Event Rate: 89% vs 56%
p-value: p=< .001
Marked prolongation of the H-Q interval (≥80 msec) in patients with BBB and transient neurologic symptoms suggests a high likelihood of episodic high-grade A-V block, warranting consideration for permanent pacemaker insertion.
Prolonged H-Q intervals were associated with complete A-V block in bundle branch block; hypothesis-generating for electrophysiologic risk stratification in transient neurologic symptoms.
His bundle electrograms were recorded in 19 patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and transient neurologic symptoms allowing for determination of intra-atrial (P-A), atrioventricular (A-V), nodal (A-H) as well as infranodal conduction (H-Q) times. The patients were initially monitored in a coronary care unit and have been followed for a mean period of 8 ± 4 months. In six patients (Group I) neurologic symptoms were observed in the absence of electrocardiographic evidence of A-V block. In six patients (Group II) the cause of symptoms was uncertain; two of these patients had relief of symptoms after permanent cardiac pacemaker insertion and were presumed to have episodic high grade A-V block. In seven subjects (Group III) complete A-V block was documented as the cause of the symptoms; these patients were studied when 1:1 antegrade A-V conduction returned. There was no significant difference between mean P-A, A-H, and QRS durations among the patients in the three groups. Mean H-Q (89 ± 20 msec) for Group III was significantly longer than that for Group I (56 ± 9 msec) or Group 11 (64 ± 11 msec) ( P < .001). All patients with presumed or documented episodes of high grade A-V block had abnormal H-Q intervals, and six of the nine patients with presumed or documented complete A-V block had H-Q intervals >80 msec. The present data suggest that patients with transient neurologic symptoms, bifascicular or left BBB associated with marked prolongation of H-Q (≧80 msec), should be seriously considered as candidates for insertion of a permanent cardiac pacemaker even in the absence of documented high grade or completeA-V block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scheinman et al. (1973) conducted an observational in Bundle branch block and transient neurologic symptoms (n=19). Documented complete A-V block vs. Absence of A-V block or uncertain cause was evaluated on Mean H-Q interval duration (p=< .001). Patients with documented complete A-V block had a significantly longer mean H-Q interval (89 msec) compared to those without A-V block (56 msec) or uncertain cause (64 msec) (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: