Key result
Remote ischemic perconditioning reduces aortic stiffness and preserves endothelial function after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion.
Why the study?
Vascular stiffness and endothelial dysfunction are accelerated by acute myocardial infarction and increase recurrent coronary event risk, but whether remote ischemic perconditioning protects against these changes is unknown.
Does remote ischemic perconditioning ameliorate coronary endothelial dysfunction and aortic stiffness following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in rats?
Does remote ischemic perconditioning ameliorate coronary endothelial dysfunction and aortic stiffness following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.0269% vs 0.03%
p-value: p=<0.05
Remote ischemic perconditioning improves distant vascular function and prevents aortic stiffness after myocardial infarction, potentially via anti-inflammatory mechanisms involving TNF-α reduction.
Hypothesis-generating in rats; leaves open whether remote ischemic perconditioning improves vascular function after myocardial infarction in humans.
BACKGROUND: Vascular stiffness and endothelial dysfunction are accelerated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and subsequently increase the risk for recurrent coronary events. AIM: To explore whether remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerc) protects against coronary and aorta endothelial dysfunction as well as aortic stiffness following AMI. METHODS: Male OFA-1 rats were subjected to 30 min of occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) followed by reperfusion either 3 or 28 days with or without RIPerc. Three groups: (1) sham operated (Sham, without LAD occlusion); (2) myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (MIR) and (3) MIR + RIPerc group with 3 cycles of 5 minutes of IR on hindlimb performed during myocardial ischemia were used. Assessment of vascular reactivity in isolated septal coronary arteries (non-occluded) and aortic rings as well as aortic stiffness was assessed by wire myography either 3 or 28 days after AMI, respectively. Markers of pro-inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules were assessed by RT-qPCR and ELISA. RESULTS: MIR promotes impaired endothelial-dependent relaxation in septal coronary artery segments, increased aortic stiffness and adverse left ventricular remodeling. These changes were markedly attenuated in rats treated with RIPerc and associated with a significant decline in P-selectin, IL-6 and TNF-α expression either in infarcted or non-infarcted myocardial tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our study for the first time demonstrated that RIPerc alleviates MIR-induced coronary artery endothelial dysfunction in non-occluded artery segments and attenuates aortic stiffness in rats. The vascular protective effects of RIPerc are associated with ameliorated inflammation and might therefore be caused by reduced inflammatory signaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szabó et al. (2021) studied Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury (n=41). Remote ischemic perconditioning vs. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion without conditioning was evaluated on Aortic stiffness (slope of linear regression from diameter-tension relationship) (p=<0.05). Remote ischemic perconditioning significantly reduced aortic stiffness (slope 0.0269 vs 0.030) and improved endothelium-dependent relaxation in rats following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: