Why the study?
Does distal persistent myocardial ischemia or remote preconditioning improve remote myocardial outcome after ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat cardiac transplantation model?
Does distal persistent myocardial ischemia or remote preconditioning improve remote myocardial outcome after ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat cardiac transplantation model?
Distal persistent myocardial ischemia after ischemia-reperfusion injury has a potentially beneficial myocardial impact in a rat model, which appears to be hampered by remote preconditioning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distal ischemia-linked glutamate reduction may indicate protection in rat IRI models; hypothesis-generating and should not yet inform clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Confined ongoing ischemia after ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) may alter myocardial recovery. We evaluated in a rat cardiac transplantation model whether distal persistent myocardial ischemia (dMI) and remote preconditioning (RPreC) have a remote myocardial impact after IRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Syngeneic heterotopic cardiac transplantation was performed on 29 Fischer344 rats to induce IRI, including nine rats which underwent distal ligation of the left anterior coronary artery (LAD) to yield distal MI (IRI+ dMI). RPreC was applied by occluding the left renal artery 5 min prior to reperfusion in six rats with IRI (IRI+ RPreC) as well as in seven with distal MI (IRI+ dMI+ RPreC). Microdialysis, histology and qRT-PCR for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were performed after graft harvesting. RESULTS: In contrast to IRI + dMI + RPreC (39 ± 7 μmol), glutamate decreased in IRI + RPreC and IRI + dMI as compared with IRI (26 ± 3 and 31 ± 8 vs 91 ± 20, μmol respectively, p < 0.007). The relative number of vacuolated intramyocardial artery nuclei decreased in IRI + dMI as compared with IRI (0.02 ± 0.01, range 0-12 vs. 0.42 ± 0.31, range 0-3.25 PSU respectively, p < 0.04). iNOS expression decreased in IRI + RPreC as compared with IRI (p < 0.04), and eNOS expression decreased in IRI + dMI + RPreC as compared with IRI + dMI (p < 0.006) along with increased glycerol release. CONCLUSIONS: dMI after IRI has a potentially beneficial myocardial impact after cardiac arrest, which is hampered by RPreC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: