Key result
Repeated remote ischemic conditioning improves LVEF by ~5% in a rat MI model.
Why the study?
The study evaluated post-ischemic left ventricular remodeling and its hypothetical prevention by repeated remote ischemic conditioning.
Does repeated remote ischemic conditioning improve myocardial function and alter ACE/ACE2 activities in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does repeated remote ischemic conditioning improve myocardial function and alter ACE/ACE2 activities in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 55.2% vs 50%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Repeated remote ischemic conditioning improves post-ischemic left ventricular performance and mitigates region-specific alterations in ACE/ACE2 activities and myofilament protein phosphorylation in a rat model of MI.
May support repeated remote ischemic conditioning in experimental post-MI remodeling; leaves open human translation and mechanisms.
Post-ischemic left ventricular (LV) remodeling and its hypothetical prevention by repeated remote ischemic conditioning (rRIC) in male Sprague–Dawley rats were studied. Myocardial infarction (MI) was evoked by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and myocardial characteristics were tested in the infarcted anterior and non-infarcted inferior LV regions four and/or six weeks later. rRIC was induced by three cycles of five-minute-long unilateral hind limb ischemia and five minutes of reperfusion on a daily basis for a period of two weeks starting four weeks after LAD occlusion. Sham operated animals served as controls. Echocardiographic examinations and invasive hemodynamic measurements revealed distinct changes in LV systolic function between four and six weeks after MI induction in the absence of rRIC (i.e., LV ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased from 52.8 ± 2.1% to 50 ± 1.6%, mean ± SEM, p < 0.05) and in the presence of rRIC (i.e., LVEF increased from 48.2 ± 4.8% to 55.2 ± 4.1%, p < 0.05). Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity was about five times higher in the anterior LV wall at six weeks than that in sham animals. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity roughly doubled in post-ischemic LVs. These increases in ACE and ACE2 activities were effectively mitigated by rRIC. Ca2+-sensitivities of force production (pCa50) of LV permeabilized cardiomyocytes were increased at six weeks after MI induction together with hypophosphorylation of 1) cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in both LV regions, and 2) cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) in the anterior wall. rRIC normalized pCa50, cTnI and cMyBP-C phosphorylations. Taken together, post-ischemic LV remodeling involves region-specific alterations in ACE and ACE2 activities together with changes in cardiomyocyte myofilament protein phosphorylation and function. rRIC has the potential to prevent these alterations and to improve LV performance following MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bódi et al. (2021) studied Myocardial infarction. Repeated remote ischemic conditioning (rRIC) vs. Sham operated animals / no rRIC was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at six weeks (p=< 0.05). Repeated remote ischemic conditioning improved left ventricular ejection fraction to 55.2% vs 50% in controls (p<0.05) and mitigated ACE/ACE2 increases in a rat model of myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: