Key result
Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmias (OR 0.27) compared to no ASV in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether adaptive servo-ventilation is effective in preventing arrhythmias in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease.
Does adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy reduce the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=141)
Yes
Does adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy reduce the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.27 (95% CI 0.11–0.63)
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 61%
p-value: p=<0.01
In patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease, adaptive servo-ventilation therapy was associated with a significantly reduced 1-year incidence of arrhythmias (PAF and VT) and improved renal function.
ASV was associated with fewer arrhythmias in ischemic HF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective Whether or not adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is effective in preventing arrhythmias in patients with heart failure (HF) due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) is unclear. This study estimated the effects of ASV therapy on arrhythmias in patients with HF due to IHD. Methods One hundred and forty-one consecutive hospitalized patients with HF due to IHD (mean age: 74.9±11.9 years old) were retrospectively assessed in this study. Of the 141 patients, 75 were treated with ASV (ASV group), and 66 were treated without ASV (Non-ASV group). We estimated the incidence of arrhythmias, including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), during one-year follow-up in both groups using multivariable logistic regression models. Results Men accounted for 55.3% of the study population. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristic data between the ASV and Non-ASV groups with respect to age, sex, heart rate, risk factors, oral medication, or laboratory data, including the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), brain natriuretic peptide, and left ventricular ejection fraction. ASV therapy was associated with a reduced incidence of arrhythmia after adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular disease risk factors (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.63; p<0.01; compared to the Non-ASV group). In addition, at the 1-year follow-up, an improvement (increase) in the eGFR was found in the ASV group but not in the Non-ASV group. Conclusion ASV therapy was able to prevent arrhythmias, including PAF and VT, with short-term improvements in the renal function in patients with HF due to IHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagasaka et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure due to ischemic heart disease (n=141). Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) vs. Non-ASV was evaluated on Incidence of arrhythmia events (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia) (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.63, p=<0.01). Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmias (OR 0.27) compared to no ASV in patients with heart failure due to ischemic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: