Why the study?
Adaptive servo-ventilation has been used to treat residual congestion in chronic heart failure, but its efficacy remains debated.
Does adaptive servo-ventilation improve a composite of cardiovascular death and cardiovascular-related hospitalization in patients with worsening heart failure?
Does adaptive servo-ventilation improve a composite of cardiovascular death and cardiovascular-related hospitalization in patients with worsening heart failure?
Adaptive servo-ventilation has a neutral effect on prognosis in patients with worsening heart failure, suggesting its use requires careful consideration in clinical practice.
ASV was not associated with improved CV outcomes in worsening HF; leaves open its role pending randomized trials.
Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapies, managing symptoms and congestion remains challenging for some patients. Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) has been used in Japan to treat residual congestion in chronic HF, but its efficacy remains debated.This study is a subanalysis of the SAVIOR-L study, a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan evaluating ASV in worsening HF. The study included 96 ASV users (ASV group) and 288 non-ASV users (non-ASV group) selected via propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death and cardiovascular-related hospitalization, assessed using a win ratio analysis.The win ratio (95% CI) for ASV was 0.838 (0.657-1.069) in the matched-pair method and 0.850 (0.829-0.872) in the unmatched-pair method. Furthermore, the results of the win ratio analysis using the matched-pair method remained consistently neutral even in stratified analyses based on heart failure severity.The results indicate that ASV use in worsening HF has a neutral effect on prognosis. While ASV does not appear to be definitively harmful, its benefits remain uncertain. Therefore, its use requires careful consideration in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hidaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: