Key result
Nearly ~22% of complex ACHD patients lose follow-up, strongly linked to remote living.
Why the study?
Little is understood about loss to follow-up in congenital heart disease after a successful transition from pediatric to adult care, which increases risks of morbidity and premature mortality.
Cohort (n=1,842)
No
More than 20% of adult congenital heart disease patients become lost to specialized care, predicted by younger age, lower socioeconomic status, remote location, and moderately complex disease.
Supports outreach for remote or disadvantaged adults with congenital heart disease; leaves open which interventions improve retention in prospective studies.
Background: Much has been written about the loss to follow-up in the transition between pediatric and adult Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) care centers. Much less is understood about the loss to follow-up (LTF) after a successful transition. This is critical too, as patients lost to specialised care are more likely to experience morbidity and premature mortality. Aims: To understand the prevalence and reasons for loss to follow-up (LTF) at a large Australian Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) centre. Methods: Patients with moderate or highly complex CHD and gaps in care of >3 years (defined as LTF) were identified from a comprehensive ACHD database. Structured telephone interviews examined current care and barriers to clinic attendance. Results: Overall, 407 (22%) of ACHD patients (n = 1842) were LTF. The mean age at LTF was 31 (SD 11.5) years and 54% were male; 311 (76%) were uncontactable. Compared to adults seen regularly, lost patients were younger, with a greater socio-economic disadvantage, and had less complex CHD (p < 0.05 for all). We interviewed 59 patients (14%). The top 3 responses for care absences were “feeling well” (61%), losing track of time (36%), and not needing follow-up care (25%). Conclusions:: A large proportion of the ACHD population becomes lost to specialised cardiac care, even after a successful transition. This Australian study reports younger age, moderate complexity defects, and socio-economic disadvantage as predictive of loss to follow-up. This study highlights the need for novel approaches to patient-centered service delivery even beyond the age of transition and resources to maintain patient engagement within the ACHD service.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dickson et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) (n=1,842). Predictors of loss to follow-up (e.g., remote location, lower socio-economic status, moderate disease complexity) vs. Patients in regular care without these risk factors was evaluated on Loss to follow-up (LTF), defined as absence from specialized ACHD care for >3 years. Overall, 22% of adults with moderate or highly complex congenital heart disease were lost to follow-up, with remote living (HR 3.12), lower socio-economic status, and moderate vs severe complexity (HR 1.46) acting as significant predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: