Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 1, 2008Critical Care Medicine

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trials evaluating mortality in intensive care: Doomed to fail?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

What proportion of multicenter randomized controlled trials in adult intensive care units demonstrate a beneficial impact on mortality?

Population

72 adult, multicenter randomized controlled trials carried out in the intensive care unit, with mortality as…

Comparison

Various intensive care interventions vs Various control groups

Design

Systematic_review

Authors

GOGustavo A. Ospina‐TascónFundación Valle del LiliGBGustavo BücheleIonis Pharmaceuticals (United States)
Jean‐Louis Vincent
Jean‐Louis VincentGeneral Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Most multicenter ICU RCTs show neutral mortality effects; challenges reliance on mortality endpoints and supports alternative primary outcomes in future trials.

Structured PICO

What proportion of multicenter randomized controlled trials in adult intensive care units demonstrate a beneficial impact on mortality?

P
Population
72 adult, multicenter randomized controlled trials carried out in the intensive care unit, with mortality as a primary outcome, and including >50 patients
I
Intervention
Various intensive care interventions
C
Comparator
Various control groups
O
Outcome
Mortalityhard clinical

Relatively few multicenter RCTs in the ICU setting demonstrate a beneficial impact on mortality, suggesting that other endpoints should be considered.

Limitations

  • Methodological limitations of some of the randomized controlled trials may have prevented positive results

Cite This Study

Ospina‐Tascón et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a22ecd3fe259f704f736025https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318168ea3e
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials1996 · 3,167 citations
  2. 2A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized, controlled trial*2006 · 714 citations
  3. 3Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't1996 · 15,911 citations
  4. 4Drotrecogin alfa (activated): does current evidence support treatment for any patients with severe sepsis?2006 · 41 citations
  5. 5Effect of dopexamine on outcome after major abdominal surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study2000 · 108 citations