Why the study?
Contemporary adult ICU trials increasingly report patient-important outcomes other than mortality, introducing challenges with outcome definitions, handling of deceased patients, missing data, and statistical methods.
There is substantial variation and suboptimal methodological choices in how contemporary ICU trials handle and report patient-important outcomes other than mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inconsistent handling of outcomes, death, and missing data in ICU RCTs warrants interpretive caution; leaves open need for standardized methods.
Granholm et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: