Key result
Preload-adjusted PWR max correlated linearly with load-independent E max (p<0.0001) and curvilinearly with load-dependent dP/dt max (p<0.0001) in sheep with induced atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does preload-adjusted PWR max accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat to beat fashion in atrial fibrillation?
Does preload-adjusted PWR max accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat to beat fashion in atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Preload-adjusted PWR max correlates linearly with E max and serves as a useful, potentially non-invasive measure of left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation.
May support noninvasive LV contractility assessment in AF; leaves open human validation.
Background: Left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation is known to change in a beat to beat fashion, but there is no gold standard for contractility indices in atrial fibrillation, especially those measured non-invasively. Objective: To determine whether the non-invasive index of contractility "preload-adjusted PWR max " (maximal ventricular power divided by the square of end diastolic volume) can accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat to beat fashion in atrial fibrillation. Methods: Atrial fibrillation was induced experimentally using 60 Hz stimulation of the atrium and maintained in 12 sheep; four received diltiazem, four digoxin, and four no drugs (control). Aortic flow, left ventricular volume, and left ventricular pressure were monitored simultaneously. Preload-adjusted PWR max , the slope of the end systolic pressure-volume relation (E max ), and the maximum rate of change of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt max ) were calculated in a beat to beat fashion. Results: Preload-adjusted PWR max correlated linearly with load independent E max (p < 0.0001) and curvilinearly with load dependent dP/dt max (p < 0.0001), which suggested the load independence of preload-adjusted PWR max . After five minutes of diltiazem administration, preload-adjusted PWR max , dP/dt max , and E max fell significantly (p < 0.0001) to 62%, 64%, and 61% of baseline, respectively. Changes were not significant after five minutes of digoxin (103%, 98%, and 102%) or in controls (97%, 96%, and 95%). Conclusions: Preload-adjusted PWR max correlates linearly with E max and is a useful measure of contractility even in atrial fibrillation. Non-invasive application of this method, in combination with echocardiography and tonometry, may yield important information for optimising the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. . . . . . . . . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G J Morgan-Hughes (2002) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=12). Preload-adjusted PWR max measurement vs. E max and dP/dt max was evaluated on Correlation of preload-adjusted PWR max with E max and dP/dt max (p=<0.0001). Preload-adjusted PWR max correlated linearly with load-independent E max (p<0.0001) and curvilinearly with load-dependent dP/dt max (p<0.0001) in sheep with induced atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: