Key result
In a retrospective analysis of 421 outpatients with hypertensive disease, the most frequently prescribed diuretics were hydrochlorothiazide (24%), indapamide (20%), and spironolactone (20%).
Why the study?
What is the structure and reasonability of diuretic therapy in outpatients with hypertensive disease in real-life clinical practice?
Observational (n=421)
What is the structure and reasonability of diuretic therapy in outpatients with hypertensive disease in real-life clinical practice?
Real-world outpatient prescription of diuretics for hypertension and heart failure in the Krasnodar Territory aligns with modern national guidelines.
Real-world diuretic prescribing in hypertension aligns with guidelines; leaves open prospective validation of appropriateness and outcomes.
The aim of the study is pharmacoepidemiologicalanalysis of the structureandreasonability of diuretic therapy in patients with hypertensive disease (HD)in ‘real-life’ clinical practicesettings.Materialandmethods:we underwentthe retrospectivepharmacoepidemiologicalcomparative analysisof the structureofdiuretic therapyreviewingoutpatient cardsfrom 2011 to 2014.We extracted data from outpatientcardsin outpatient department of Krasnodar Territoryusingcontinuous sampling method(421 patients)with the subsequent assessmentin accordance withmodern guidance materials. Results. In comparison with the regional study historic resultsthe administrationoftorsemidehad significantly increasedin patients withHD andnoncomplicatedchronic cardiac failure(12%).The priority drugs for the administrationamong diuretics werehydrochlorothiazide (24%)and indapamide (20%),spironolactone (20%).The ACE inhibitoror sartanusing in fixed combination with diuretic was recommended in 20% of out- patient cards.Structure ofdiuretic distribution in group of patients with HD, associated withCHF(II-IVfunctional class)had showedthe efficiencyof spironolactonein26%,of hydrochlorothiazide - 15%,torsemide - 13%,indapamide - 7%;the combination of spironolactoneandtorsemidewas receivedby 14% of patients,the combination of spironolactoneandhydrochlorothiazide - 6%,spironolactoneand furosemide - 1%,in 4% of outpatient cardswe noticed the triple combination of monocomponentdiuretic.Conclusion. We did not find unreasonable administration of diuretic therapy combination out ofindication and in the presence of contradictions.The prescription of modern long-termdiuretics associated with lower risk of side-effects developing will improve efficiencyand safetyof pharmacotherapy.It is very important to use fixed drugs combinationin case of administration the diuretic and agentsofrenin angiotensin system inhibitors.The volume and prescription reasonability analysis ofdiuretic therapy in patients withHDin ‘real-life’ clinical practicesettingshas shown compliance with modernnational guidance materials for the HD and CHF treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Пономарева et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Hypertensive disease (n=421). Diuretic therapy was evaluated on Structure and reasonability of diuretic therapy. In a retrospective analysis of 421 outpatients with hypertensive disease, the most frequently prescribed diuretics were hydrochlorothiazide (24%), indapamide (20%), and spironolactone (20%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: