Key result
Application of radiofrequency energy or electrical cautery during procedures caused no oversensing, reprogramming, or damage in 45 consecutive patients with ICDs.
Why the study?
Does the application of radiofrequency energy cause oversensing, reprogramming, or damage in patients with ICDs undergoing surgical or interventional procedures?
Observational (n=45)
Does the application of radiofrequency energy cause oversensing, reprogramming, or damage in patients with ICDs undergoing surgical or interventional procedures?
Application of RF energy during surgical and interventional procedures did not cause oversensing, reprogramming, or damage to ICDs, suggesting electromagnetic interference is highly unlikely even if inactivation is not possible.
May support RF use in ICD patients without inactivation; leaves open prospective confirmation in larger cohorts.
During surgical and interventional procedures, interference may occur between ICDs and electrical cautery or with the application of RF energy. This may lead to the false induction of ICD therapies or could even result in device malfunction, which represents a potential perioperative hazard for the patient. This study analyzed the intraoperative interactions in 45 consecutive ICD patients in reference to different surgical and interventional procedures. A total of 33 surgical operations (general surgery [n = 14], urologic [n = 5], abdominal [n = 10], gynecological [n = 2], thoracic [n = 1], neurosurgical [n = 1]) and 12 interventional therapies (RF catheter ablation [n = 10], endoscopic papillotomy [n = 2]) were performed. The ICD devices were all located in left pectoral position and consisted of 25 single and 20 dual chamber defibrillators. During the procedure, tachyarrhythmia detection (VF 296 +/- 20 ms, VT 376 +/- 49 ms) of the devices was maintained active (monitoring mode), only ICD therapies were inactivated. The indifferent electrode of the electrical cauter/RF generator was placed in standard positions (right/left mid-femoral position [n = 27/8], thoracic spine area [n = 10]). After the procedure, the ICD memory was checked for detections and for changes in the programming. There was no oversensing, reprogramming, or damage of any defibrillator caused by RF energy. Despite the lack of undesired interactions, ICDs should be inactivated preoperatively to assure maximum patient safety. However, should inactivation not be possible, or the achievement uncertain, electromagnetic interference is highly unlikely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiek et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (n=45). Radiofrequency energy or electrical cautery was evaluated on Oversensing, reprogramming, or damage of defibrillator. Application of radiofrequency energy or electrical cautery during procedures caused no oversensing, reprogramming, or damage in 45 consecutive patients with ICDs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: