Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Philosophical discussions of personal identity depend upon thought experiments which describe psychological vicissitudes and question whether the original person survives in the person resulting from the described change. These cases are meant to determine the types of psychological change compatible with personal continuation. Two main accounts of identity try to capture this distinction; psychological continuity theories and narrative theories. I argue that neither fully succeeds since both overlook the importance of a relationship I call “empathic access.” I define empathic access and discuss its role in a complete account of personal identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marya Schechtman (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: