Key result
During load manipulation with sodium nitroprusside, the SBP/LVIDs ratio was insensitive to changes in load, showing only a 5% variation from baseline compared to 37% for SBP/ESV and 51% for ESS/LVIDs.
Why the study?
Does the SBP/LVIDs ratio remain independent of load changes during sodium nitroprusside infusion in patients with primary hypertension?
Does the SBP/LVIDs ratio remain independent of load changes during sodium nitroprusside infusion in patients with primary hypertension?
The SBP/LVIDs ratio is a load-insensitive echocardiographic index of left ventricular contractility that can be reliably used in the clinical evaluation of hypertensive patients.
SBP/LVIDs may offer a load-insensitive contractility index in hypertension; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
Load changes were obtained in 7 females with untreated primary hypertension by means of controlled intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside (0.2 mg/ml), in order to assess variations in the more usual indexes of left ventricular (LV) contractility to different loads and to verify that those indexes were independent of load. 2D-controlled M-mode echocardiograms were performed at baseline and when systolic blood pressure (SBP) had been reduced by 7, 16 and 23% for at least 5 min. Heart rate did not change during the test; decrease in SBP was associated with either decreases in both end-systolic dimension (LVIDs) and end-systolic stress (ESS), or an increase in systolic function. SBP/LVIDs, SBP/end-systolic volume (ESV) and ESS/LVIDs ratios were examined and compared as indexes of contractile state. SBP/ESV and ESS/LVIDs ratios showed great variation at all stages as compared to baseline values, while the SBP/LVIDs ratio did not change. The percent variation between the baseline values and the last stage of the test was 51% for the ESS/LVIDs ratio, 37% for the SBP/ESV and 5% for the SBP/LVIDs ratio. Best-fitting regression showed that a linear relationship existed only between SBP and LVIDs. Echocardiographic two-dimensional (as ESS) or three-dimensional derivations (as ESV) should be carefully employed when the contractile state is studied, while the SBP/LVIDs ratio can be easily used as a baseline value, as it is insensitive to changes in load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simone et al. (1988) studied Untreated primary hypertension (n=7). Sodium nitroprusside vs. Baseline was evaluated on Percent variation of the SBP/LVIDs ratio between baseline and the last stage of load reduction. During load manipulation with sodium nitroprusside, the SBP/LVIDs ratio was insensitive to changes in load, showing only a 5% variation from baseline compared to 37% for SBP/ESV and 51% for ESS/LVIDs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: