Key result
Trial protocol outlines 2x2 factorial comparison of GDMT and loop diuretics on KCCQ scores.
Why the study?
Evidence on optimal drug sequencing in HFrEF is scarce, and the choice between long-acting and short-acting loop diuretics remains uncertain alongside modern neurohormonal therapies.
Does sacubitril/valsartan versus dapagliflozin and torsemide versus furosemide improve health status in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
RCT (n=240)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
1:1 ratio to sacubitril/valsartan or dapagliflozin, and torsemide or furosemide (2x2 factorial)
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan versus dapagliflozin and torsemide versus furosemide improve health status in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
This trial protocol outlines a pragmatic 2x2 factorial study to determine the optimal sequencing of modern neurohormonal therapies and choice of loop diuretics on health status in patients with HFrEF.
No practice change from protocol alone; trial will address optimal sequencing of modern therapies on health status in HFrEF.
INTRODUCTION: The current guidelines strongly recommend early initiation of multiple classes of cardioprotective drugs for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to improve prognosis and health status. However, evidence on the optimal sequencing of approved drugs is scarce, highlighting the importance of individualised treatment plans. Registry data indicate that only a portion of these patients can tolerate all four recommended classes, underscoring the need to establish the favoured sequence when using these drugs. Additionally, the choice between long-acting and short-acting loop diuretics in the present era remains uncertain. This is particularly relevant given the frequent use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, both of which potentiate natriuretic effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint method, LAQUA-HF (Long-acting vs short-acting diuretics and neurohormonal Agents on patients' QUAlity-of-life in Heart Failure patients) will be a 2×2 factorial design, with a total of 240 patients randomised to sacubitril/valsartan versus dapagliflozin and torsemide versus furosemide in a 1:1 ratio. Most enrolment sites have participated in an ongoing observational registry for consecutive patients hospitalised for heart failure involved dedicated study coordinators, and used the same framework to enrol patients. The primary endpoint is the change in patients' health status over 6 months, defined by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Additionally, clinical benefit at 6 months defined as a hierarchical composite endpoint will be assessed by the win ratio as the secondary endpoint. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The medical ethics committee Keio University in Japan has approved this trial. All participants provide written informed consent prior to study entry. The results of this trial will be disseminated in one main paper and additional papers on secondary endpoints and subgroup analyses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000045229.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiraishi et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=240). Sacubitril/valsartan and Torsemide vs. Dapagliflozin and Furosemide was evaluated on Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OSS) score from baseline to 6 months. This is a trial protocol; no clinical efficacy or safety results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: