Why the study?
ARNI and SGLT2 inhibitors are both first-line therapies for HFrEF, but no head-to-head trials are available, and the prognostic marker GDF-15 has not been widely explored.
Does dapagliflozin improve NT-proBNP levels compared to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF?
Does dapagliflozin improve NT-proBNP levels compared to sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF?
This protocol describes a pragmatic randomized trial comparing the effects of dapagliflozin versus sacubitril/valsartan on NT-proBNP levels in patients with HFrEF over 16 weeks.
Head-to-head RCT of ARNI versus SGLT2i in HFrEF remains absent; this protocol extends direct comparative and GDF-15 data.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure affects almost 64 million people, with more than half of it constituting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) are in the first line for HFrEF, but no head-to-head trials are available. Moreover, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has been demonstrated as a promising prognostic marker, specifically for HFrEF, but has not been explored much. METHODS: This pragmatic randomised controlled trial recruits 100 patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%) of New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III and allocates them in a 1:1 ratio to the dapagliflozin and sacubitril/valsartan groups. The primary objective is to assess the difference in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide serum levels at the end of 16 weeks. The secondary efficacy objectives are to assess GDF-15, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-overall summary score and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Patients will be assessed at baseline, fourth week and 16th week after randomisation. As health technology assessment practices widely differ in countries, cost assessment is a vital factor to consider. The cost needed to treat one cardiovascular event is also compared between both groups. The occurrence of safety events will also be evaluated at each follow-up point. CONCLUSION: This pragmatic study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF in real-world settings. The study aims to provide clinicians with data to make informed decisions regarding the preferred drug class. Additionally, examining the impact of ARNI and SGLT2i on GDF-15 levels could offer better insights into prognosis among patients with HFrEF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study involves human participants and was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee at AlIMS Jodhpur with reference number AIIMS/IEC/2023/5842 approved this study. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The research findings will be disseminated via closed group discussions at the site of study, scientific conferences, peer-reviewed published manuscripts, and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2023/12/060772.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: