Why the study?
In ACS, BVS implantation is demanding and carries potential risks regarding lesion preparation and vessel sizing, so the authors evaluated long-term outcomes according to implantation technique.
Does the PSP-technique (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation) improve clinical outcomes compared to non-PSP technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?
Does the PSP-technique (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation) improve clinical outcomes compared to non-PSP technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using the PSP-technique (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation) for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in ACS patients significantly reduces long-term target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events.
BACKGROUND: The PSP (predilatation, sizing, post-dilatation)-technique was developed to improve the prognosis of patients after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the use of BVS is particularly demanding and carries some potential risk regarding aggressive lesion preparation, proper vessel sizing due to spasm and thrombus inside the artery. The aim herein, was to determine the long-term results of BVS stenting in ACS patients depending on the scaffold implantation technique. METHODS: The present study is a prospective, two-center study, which consisted of 182 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA) implantation for the ACS. All patients were divided into two groups. The first consisted of 52 patients treated with the PSP-technique (PSP group). The second group enrolled 130 patients treated with a non-PSP procedure (non-PSP group). RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all patients. The mean observation time was 28.8 ± 16.5 months (median 28.3 months, interquartile range 24.0 [17.0-41.0] months). It was found that target vessel failure (TVF) was consistently reduced in patients using the PSP-technique as compared with the non-PSP group (5.8% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.03). Moreover, PSP-technique was superior to non-PSP-technique concerning major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (3.7% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of PSP technique significantly decreased the risk of target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, p = 0.01), TVF (OR 0.28, p = 0.03) and MACE (OR 0.29, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The PSP-technique for BVS implantation improves long-term results and should also be recommended for newer generations of the bioresorbable scaffold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiczkiewicz et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: