Key result
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold yields ~4% 1-year major adverse cardiac event rate.
Why the study?
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold technology has been associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis, necessitating assessment of real-life outcomes with Absorb BVS.
Cohort (n=2,072)
Yes
Registry data support optimized Absorb evaluation in practice; leaves open long-term randomized comparisons versus metallic stents.
BACKGROUND: Several randomized studies have shown that bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) technology is associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. AIM: This study aimed to assess the rates of adverse outcomes at 1 year in patients treated with the Absorb BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), using data from a large nationwide prospective multicentre registry (FRANCE ABSORB). METHODS: All patients receiving the Absorb BVS in France were included prospectively in the study. Predilatation, optimal sizing and postdilatation were recommended systematically. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were scaffold thrombosis and target vessel revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 2072 patients at 86 centres were included: mean age 55±11 years; 80% men. The indication was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 49% of cases. Predilatation and postdilatation were done in 93% and 83% of lesions, respectively. At 1 year, the primary endpoint occurred in 3.9% of patients, the rate of scaffold thrombosis was 1.5% and the rate of target vessel revascularization was 3.3%. In a multivariable analysis, diabetes and total Absorb BVS length>30mm were independently associated with the occurrence of the primary endpoint, whereas oral anticoagulation and total Absorb BVS length>30mm were independently associated with occurrence of scaffold thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The Absorb BVS was implanted in a relatively young population, half of whom had ACS. Predilatation and postdilatation rates were high, and 1-year outcomes were acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cayla et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,072). Absorb Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Implantation of the Absorb Bioresorbable vascular scaffold resulted in a 3.9% rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: