Key result
Patient-oriented mHealth interventions consistently improved quality of life in heart failure patients, while results regarding hospitalizations and other clinical outcomes were mixed.
Why the study?
Mobile health is increasingly used to aid HF self-care, but a comprehensive summary of its effects on patient outcomes was needed.
Do patient-oriented mHealth interventions improve quality of life, self-care, and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Do patient-oriented mHealth interventions improve quality of life, self-care, and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Smartphone and tablet-based mHealth interventions appear to consistently improve quality of life and self-care in heart failure patients, though their impact on hard clinical outcomes like hospitalizations remains mixed and requires further high-quality research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports mHealth for QoL gains in HF; extends self-care evidence while leaving effects on hospitalizations unresolved.
Heart failure (HF) is a debilitating disease with 26 million patients worldwide. Consistent and complex self-care is required on the part of patients to adequately adhere to medication and to the lifestyle changes that the disease necessitates. Mobile health (mHealth) is being increasingly incorporated in patient interventions in HF, as smartphones prove to be ideal platforms for patient education and self-help assistance. This systematic review aims to summarize and report on all studies that have tested the effect of mHealth on HF patient outcomes. Our search yielded 17 studies, namely 11 randomized controlled trials and six non-randomized prospective studies. In these, patients with the assistance of an mHealth intervention regularly measured their blood pressure and/or body weight and assessed their symptoms. The outcomes were mostly related to hospitalizations, clinical biomarkers, patients' knowledge about HF, quality of life (QoL) and quality of self-care. QoL consistently increased in patients who received mHealth interventions, while study results on all other outcomes were not as ubiquitously positive. The first mHealth interventions in HF were not universally successful in improving patient outcomes but provided valuable insights for patient-oriented application development. Future trials are expected to build on these insights and deploy applications that measurably assist HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mouselimis et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Heart Failure. Patient-oriented mHealth interventions (smartphone or tablet apps) vs. Standard care or non-mHealth control was evaluated on Quality of life, hospitalizations, clinical biomarkers, knowledge about HF, and quality of self-care. Patient-oriented mHealth interventions consistently improved quality of life in heart failure patients, while results regarding hospitalizations and other clinical outcomes were mixed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: