Key result
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduced 30-day mortality compared to control in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.97; P=0.03), independent of thienopyridine pretreatment.
Why the study?
Do glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Meta-Analysis (n=7,414)
Do glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Relative Risk: 0.75 (95% CI 0.57–0.97)
p-value: p=0.03
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce 30-day mortality and TVR in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, with the mortality benefit driven by baseline mortality risk rather than thienopyridine pretreatment status.
Supports GPI consideration in STEMI primary PCI; challenges recent doubts by confirming mortality benefit independent of thienopyridine pretreatment.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have casted a doubt on usefulness of routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIA inhibitors (GPI) in patients, pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel, undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of relevant factors, particularly thienopyridine pretreatment, on clinical benefit from GPI in randomized controlled trials (RCT). METHODS: We searched electronic databases for RCT comparing GPI to control in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Relevant study covariates and clinical outcomes were extracted. A random effect cumulative and subgroup analyses (thienopyridine non-pretreated studies vs. pretreated studies) were performed. A weighted random effect meta-regression to determine the effect of thienopyridine pretreatment, enrollment year, control group mortality, and ischemic time on mortality benefit from GPI use was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty studies (9 non-pretreated, 11 pretreated) with a total of 7,414 patients (3,811 GPI, 3,603 control) were included. GPI use reduces mortality (risk ratio, RR = 0.75 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.97, P = 0.03), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.80, P = 0.0002), but not reinfarction (RR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-1.0, P = 0.05) at 30 days. There was no effect of thienopyridine pretreatment on reduction in mortality (P = 0.39), reinfarction (P = 0.46), or TVR (P = 0.95) in subgroup analysis. Meta-regression analyses showed significant effect of control group mortality risk (B = -12.15, P = 0.034) but not of thienopyridine pretreatment, enrollment year or control group ischemic time on mortality reduction from GPI use. CONCLUSION: The benefit from GPI use in primary PCI for STEMI appears to depend on mortality risk, and not on thienopyridine pretreatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sethi et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=7,414). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) vs. control was evaluated on mortality at 30 days (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.97, p=0.03). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduced 30-day mortality compared to control in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.97; P=0.03), independent of thienopyridine pretreatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: