Key result
Surgical revascularisation increased ejection fraction at 12 months by 11±1% in patients with viable myocardium versus 7±1% in those without viable myocardium (p=0.002).
Why the study?
Does surgical revascularisation improve left ventricular systolic function in patients with non-viable myocardium compared to those with viable myocardium?
Cohort (n=115)
No
Does surgical revascularisation improve left ventricular systolic function in patients with non-viable myocardium compared to those with viable myocardium?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 7%
p-value: p=0.002
Surgical revascularisation improves left ventricular ejection fraction even in patients without viable myocardium on dobutamine stress echocardiography, although the recovery is more gradual and slightly less pronounced than in those with viable myocardium.
Revascularisation may improve EF even without viability on DSE; leaves open whether viability testing should guide decisions pending RCTs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of surgical revascularisation on left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with viable and non-viable dysfunctional LV segments determined by low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients referred to surgical revascularisation (n=115). INTERVENTIONS: DSE and surgical revascularisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional recovery defined as increase in ejection fraction ≥ 5% 1 year after revascularisation in patients with and without viable myocardium (viability defined as improvement of contractility in ≥ 4 LV segments on DSE). RESULTS: The mean age, ejection fraction and wall motion score index (WMSi) of patients were 59 ± 9 years, 44 ± 9% and 1.82 ± 0.31, respectively. There was no difference between DSE positive and DSE negative patients for any of those parameters at baseline study (p>0.05 for all). After 12 months, the ejection fraction increased 11 ± 1% in patients with viable myocardium vs 7 ± 1% in patients without viable myocardium (p=0.002). Moreover, in patients with viable myocardium, the greatest increase of ejection fraction occurred 1 month after surgery (9 ± 1%), whereas in those patients with negative DSE the ejection fraction increased more gradually (2±1% after 1 month, p=0.002 between groups for 1 month vs preoperative value), but still improved after 12 months follow-up (p<0.0001 in time for both groups). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that patients with LV dysfunction, but without viable myocardium, may also benefit from myocardial revascularisation. Functional recovery continuously occurs throughout the first year after surgical treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stipac et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=115). Viable myocardium vs. Non-viable myocardium was evaluated on Increase in ejection fraction 1 year after revascularisation (p=0.002). Surgical revascularisation increased ejection fraction at 12 months by 11±1% in patients with viable myocardium versus 7±1% in those without viable myocardium (p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: