Key result
Guideline-directed medical therapy was independently associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76; P<0.001) in patients with CAD and HFrEF.
Why the study?
GDMT is underutilized in CAD, and no studies had evaluated the impact of GDMT adherence on mortality in patients with both CAD and HFrEF.
Does adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and HFrEF?
Comparison
GDMT adherence vs non-adherence
Design
Post hoc analysis of a randomized trial using multivariable Cox regression
Follow-up
Median 9.8 years
Authors
Loading...
GDMT adherence may lower mortality in CAD-HFrEF; leaves open prospective trials on adherence strategies.
RCT (n=1,212)
randomized
Does adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy reduce all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.56–0.76)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy is associated with a significant reduction in long-term mortality in patients with CAD and HFrEF, independent of surgical revascularization.
Wolfe et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=1,212). Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) vs. Non-adherence to GDMT was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76, p=< 0.001). Guideline-directed medical therapy was independently associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76; P<0.001) in patients with CAD and HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: