Key result
The presence of J waves in patients with ARVC was associated with complete discordance of latest endocardial/epicardial activation sites compared to those without J waves (0% vs 90.6%; P<0.001).
Why the study?
J-wave syndrome in ARVC patients has been linked to increased ventricular arrhythmia risk, but the significance of J waves regarding substrate manifestations and ablation outcomes was unclear.
Does the presence of J waves correlate with specific substrate characteristics and ablation outcomes in patients with ARVC?
Observational (n=45)
Does the presence of J waves correlate with specific substrate characteristics and ablation outcomes in patients with ARVC?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 90.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
In ARVC patients, the presence of J waves is associated with transmural depolarization discrepancy and longer epicardial activation times, but does not significantly impact VT/VF recurrence after ablation.
J waves may flag transmural activation mismatch in ARVC ablation; leaves open effects on recurrence and mapping strategy.
AIMS: J-wave syndrome in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has been linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. We investigated the significance of J waves with respect to substrate manifestations and ablation outcomes in patients with ARVC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-five patients with ARVC undergoing endocardial/epicardial mapping/ablation were studied. Patients were classified into two groups: 13 (28.9%) and 32 (71.1%) patients with and without J waves, respectively. The baseline characteristics, electrophysiological features, ventricular substrate, and recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) were compared. Among the 13 patients with J waves, only the inferior J wave was observed. More ARVC patients with J waves fulfilled the major criteria of ventricular arrhythmias (76.9% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.003). Similar endocardial and epicardial substrate characteristics were observed between the two groups. However, patients with J waves had longer epicardial total activation time than those without (224.7 ± 29.9 vs. 200.8 ± 21.9 ms, P = 0.005). Concordance of latest endo/epicardial activation sites was observed in 29 (90.6%) patients without J waves and in none among those with J waves (P < 0.001). Complete elimination of endocardial/epicardial abnormal potentials resulted in the disappearance of the J wave in 8 of 13 (61.5%) patients. The VT/VF recurrences were not different between ARVC patients with and without J waves. CONCLUSION: The presence of J waves was associated with the discordance of endocardial/epicardial activation pattern in terms of transmural depolarization discrepancy in patients with ARVC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (n=45). Presence of J waves vs. Absence of J waves was evaluated on Concordance of latest endo/epicardial activation sites (p=<0.001). The presence of J waves in patients with ARVC was associated with complete discordance of latest endocardial/epicardial activation sites compared to those without J waves (0% vs 90.6%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: