Key result
High-risk AF-FABP4 aggregate score linked to ~2.3-fold higher AF recurrence after catheter ablation.
Why the study?
The utility of biomarkers in characterizing atrial cardiomyopathy is unclear.
Does an aggregate score combining AF pattern and FABP4 levels predict atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation in patients with AF?
Cohort (n=299)
No
Does an aggregate score combining AF pattern and FABP4 levels predict atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation in patients with AF?
Hazard Ratio: 2.32 (95% CI 1.19–4.5)
p-value: p=0.014
Adding the adiposity marker FABP4 to traditional clinical AF classifications improves the prediction of structural remodeling and ablation failure in patients with atrial fibrillation.
May aid post-ablation risk stratification in AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Aims: The utility of biomarkers in characterizing atrial cardiomyopathy is unclear. We aim to test the ability of biomarkers of fibrosis (galectin-3 (Gal-3)) and adiposity (fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) and leptin) to predict: (1) the presence of low-voltage areas (LVA) in the electroanatomic voltage mapping; and (2) the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: Patients referred for PVI were enrolled. Areas of bipolar voltage < 0.5 mV were considered as LVA. An aggregate score incorporating AF pattern (paroxysmal, persistent and long-standing persistent) and peripheral levels of FABP4 (>20 ng/mL) was developed. Results: 299 patients were included. AF was paroxysmal in 100 (33%), persistent in 130 (43%) and long-standing persistent in 69 (23%). Multivariable analysis revealed age, left atrium area, and the proposed score as independent predictors of LVA. During a mean follow-up period of 972 ± 451 days, freedom from AF recurrence was 63%. The score incorporating AF pattern and FABP4 levels accurately predicted freedom from AF recurrence, stratifying risk into ranges from 28% (score of 1) to 68% (score of 3). Cox regression models identified the score including AF pattern + FABP4 as the best model for AF recurrence (hazard ratio 2.32; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.5; p = 0.014). Conclusions: Traditional clinical classification of atrial cardiomyopathy may be improved by markers of adiposity (FABP4). The combination allows better prediction of the presence of LVA and AF recurrence post-PVI. Gal-3 provided no added predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López-Canoa et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=299). Aggregate score (AF pattern + FABP4 levels) vs. Traditional clinical AF classification (AF pattern alone) or lower risk scores was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (highest risk group, Score 3) (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.19-4.5, p=0.014). An aggregate score incorporating atrial fibrillation pattern and peripheral FABP4 levels >20 ng/mL strongly predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation (HR 2.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: