PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia23 citationsOpen Access

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Five Decades of More Light and Less Shadows

View Full Paper
FNFernando NobreDMDécio Mion

Key Result

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring provides better correlation with hypertension risks and improves diagnosis and prognosis assessment compared to casual office measurements.

Structured PICO

Does Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) improve the assessment, diagnosis, and management of hypertension compared to casual blood pressure measurements?

P
Population
Patients requiring blood pressure assessment
E
Exposure
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)
C
Comparator
Casual/office blood pressure measurements
O
Outcome
Assessment of blood pressure behaviors, establishment of diagnoses, prognosis, and efficacy of antihypertensive therapy

ABPM is a superior method for assessing blood pressure behavior, diagnosing hypertension phenotypes (such as white coat and masked hypertension), and evaluating treatment efficacy compared to casual office measurements.

Abstract

Casual blood pressure measurements have been extensively questioned over the last five decades. A significant percentage of patients have different blood pressure readings when examined in the office or outside it. For this reason, a change in the paradigm of the best manner to assess blood pressure has been observed. The method that has been most widely used is the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring - ABPM. The method allows recording blood pressure measures in 24 hours and evaluating various parameters such as mean BP, pressure loads, areas under the curve, variations between daytime and nighttime, pulse pressure variability etc. Blood pressure measurements obtained by ABPM are better correlated, for example, with the risks of hypertension. The main indications for ABPM are: suspected white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, evaluation of the efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy in 24 hours, and evaluation of symptoms. There is increasing evidence that the use of ABPM has contributed to the assessment of blood pressure behaviors, establishment of diagnoses, prognosis and the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. There is no doubt that the study of 24-hour blood pressure behavior and its variations by ABPM has brought more light and less darkness to the field, which justifies the title of this review.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nobre et al. (2016) conducted a review in Hypertension. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) vs. Casual blood pressure measurements was evaluated. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring provides better correlation with hypertension risks and improves diagnosis and prognosis assessment compared to casual office measurements.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a24a1312cce50ba1686319bhttps://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160065
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper