Key result
This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Pulmonary rehabilitation is well established for chronic lung disease, but its role in patients with COVID-19 had not been systematically studied.
Does pulmonary rehabilitation improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life in patients with COVID-19?
Systematic Review
Does pulmonary rehabilitation improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life in patients with COVID-19?
This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol for pulmonary rehabilitation meta-analysis in COVID-19 registered; leaves open efficacy questions until results emerge.
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a well-established treatment for patients with chronic lung disease; however, its role in patients with COVID-19 has not been systematically studied. We provide a protocol outlining the methods and analyses that will be used in the systematic review. METHODS: The methodology of this systematic review protocol has been filed in PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42022301418. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and CNKI databases) will be searched from 2019 to 28 July 2022, using pre-determined search terms. Eligibility criteria will be defined using a PICOS framework. Pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life will be the primary outcomes. Quantitative findings will be narratively synthesized, whilst argument synthesis combined with refutational analysis will be employed to synthesize qualitative data. RESULTS: The results will be presented by both meta-analysis and qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION: This protocol describes what will be the first systematic review to conduct a worldwide assessment of the effect of PR in patients with COVID-19. Because this is a systematic review and meta-analysis, no ethical approval is needed. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated both electronically and in print.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in COVID-19. Pulmonary rehabilitation was evaluated on Pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: